6w40b
With the false sense of anonymity and unlimited security on the internet, some apps that propose anonymous messages have gained great popularity with the proposal to make it even easier. However, this generates a lot of controversy.
The new social network Sarahah encourages s to send secret messages to other people and has won over the public. At the end of July, the app overtook famous apps in Brazil. The service was the leader in s for App Store, app store for iPhones, this Friday (28).
As the name says: Sarahah, in Arabic, means frankness. The idea of the application is to offer the to send anonymous messages that have positive content. Even constructive criticism and praise. However, s do not always follow this same line.
The app launched in February has already been very successful in the Middle East and North Africa. This week, however, it caused a surprise by displacing famous apps in the West, reaching some popularity in Brazil and also in the USA.
No Android, it has already sured the 1 million s mark. Basically, the app is a kind of Ask.fm and it can be very cool, but also the door to some annoyances. In the app there is no possibility to interact with the comments.
How does Saranah work? g1w1t
After creating an , the is invited to disclose their profile on social networks such as WhatsApp;
With this, the allows anyone to send him a message. Incoming and outgoing messages are stored in the inbox. You can find friends through the app's search tool. Both received and sent messages do not have their authors revealed.
Control 5d4m4p
Despite the controversy, the creators have added a function that can make the environment safer. It allows you to disable anonymous comments, which can help filter messages. You can also avoid being found by searching; limiting people you offer your link to knowing your profile.
Applications that provide some type of anonymity have already been a reason for controversy in the country. O Secret, a similar application, was banned in 2014 by the Espírito Santo Justice. For the judge, if people published secrets without revealing identities, they violated constitutional principles by allowing the use of freedom of expression without identifying the author. The following year, the app ceased to exist.
