
reading the synopsis of “Tomorrow's Watcher: Ghost in the Shell” maybe you feel like you've seen this movie before. After all, the plot is centered on the story of a cyborg, Major, who lives a serious existential dilemma: is she a human inhabiting a mechanical carcass or a programmed creature, without free will? And besides, she has a footprint cyberpunk and features a super-computerized futuristic setting that looks familiar. 6k5v23
Possibly you ed long like "Matrix" (1999) and "Artificial intelligence" (2001). Would it then be an unoriginal production? On the contrary.
For 20 years, works like these were inspired by the manga by Masamuna Shirow, "Ghost in the Shell", in which the director Rupert Sanders based to create the universe of this fiction. Therefore, despite being late, we can say that this film adaptation brings together the original elements that so innovated the science fictions of the film industry.
This live action it even recreates, page by page, some moments of Shirow's work. But, it uses production design to reinvent itself. Just look at the care they took to give life to the megalopolis where everything unfolds. A place full of holograms, which impresses the viewer with the wealth of details. The fan of the 1995 manga or anime, then, feels like a real spectacle.

However, the American production suffers from an excess of didacticism at certain moments. as others usually do blockbusters, emphasizes some concepts to make sure the audience is following along. The good thing is that the film compensates in other situations, leaving open questions for each one to reach their own conclusion.
although your casting it was a little controversial, Scarlett Johansson was a good choice to play Major. With your blank stare and expression blase, the actress was able to illustrate all the introspection of the protagonist. The film's biggest problem, however, was the villain. kuze. lived by Michael Pitt, the antagonist does not appear to be a real threat to Major. It works almost like an accessory, something to drive the cyborg story.
In general , the film takes risks to some extent, but does not try to be revolutionary. Go with caution and present an interesting and engaging story. But between us, the visual effects and production design alone would be worth the movie ticket. If you can go to one IMAX room, do not hesitate.
Have you watched the movie? Leave your opinion in the comments!