Table of Contents 64q43
Some time ago, we made a comparison here at Showmetech sobre or OLED and QLED. When we talk about cutting-edge technology for Smart TVs, these two acronyms quickly appear. However, the time has come to introduce another competitor in this fight: the MicroLED. So how about we get back to this topic? j4i2q
The main representative of QLED technology is the Samsung, while the representative of OLED is the LG. The MicroLED is being developed initially by Samsung as well, in response to some advantages of the rival's OLED.
Between qualities and defects, let's analyze a little here what we have of information about the three. In addition, it is good to take a look at the indications of use of each one. That's for us to know if Samsung's new bet is really more viable than the previous ones.
Taking back the advantages of QLED 6b1m6b
The main difference from QLED for the two other technologies being compared here is the fact that it retains the backlight. However, even though this seems like a delay, it allows for more accurate colors at very high brightness levels.
However, Smart TV models QLED have a very low reflection filter. Thus, it guarantees considerable improvements in pollution from off- reflections. In addition, the level of fidelity that this technology has with colors is surprising.
We also have the brightness of QLED TVs, which can vary from 1500 to 2000 nits, while the average of other devices is 1000 nits. This allows your images to be much sharper in any type of environment. Regarding installation, these televisions have very few visible installation cables. This is because of OneConnect, an external hub that gathers all necessary connections.
The high points of OLED 4g6o5a
On the other hand, OLED, a technology developed by LG, has a full of organic diodes that replace the LED lamps on your television. This technology allows its small diodes to light up autonomously, dispensing with backlighting s.
Thus, TVs with this technology have a much more vivid contrast system than competitors. Being that it can also reach the so-called “true black”. Other than that, the viewing angle problem that other TV models have is solved in OLED.
Due to the absence of backlighting, the viewer can see the images on the OLED screen almost in any position within the 180º around it perfectly. In of the hardware itself, organic diodes in OLED TVs are even smaller than LEDs. (https://inboundrem.com) As a result, the thickness of the device is much smaller, taking up less space and allowing the creation of curved screens.
The advantages of MicroLED 6io37
It is important to start by saying that the technology of MicroLED from Samsung is not the same as LED TVs. However, it closely resembles LG's OLED. That's because of features that match it with the competitor like the "true black" and the infinite contrast ratio.
Now in comparison, MicroLED is simply not the same as OLED. Among its particularities is the fact that the technology relies on an inorganic material for the production of light, gallium nitride (GaN). OLED, in comparison, uses organic products.
The advantage of MicroLED's GaN in this case is the fact that it dispenses with the use of layers with polarizers or encapsulation in front of the of millions of LEDs. With this, the MicroLED screen can be even thinner than OLED! Its power consumption is also much lower, consuming about 50% less energy than OLED and 90% less than a traditional LCD.
Finally, a final advantage of MicroLED is its scope. That's because the thinnest s along with incredible energy savings make it a useful technology not just for TVs. Think about the possibilities of applying this futuristic screen on smartphones, for example.
The weaknesses of QLED 662m29
Initially, we have in QLED the black problem. Compared to OLED or MicroLED, the closest scale to the “true black” achieved by QLED is a very dark grey. That's because the TV is very focused on the high brightness level. So, its closer to black scales don't even compare to the absolute black of OLED or MicroLED.
Another of its disadvantages is in its innovations, which are very few. For consumers more avid for technological innovations, little is really unheard of in QLEDs. What we have here is in fact the best way to take advantage of technologies that have been used before, such as quantum dots.
OLED and its problems 1b524n
In turn, OLED has a very low maximum brightness potential. With this, the images are much darker than we normally see on other devices. This mainly affects very bright scenes, which have problems with saturation levels.
Another weakness of OLED is its lifespan. This is much lower than similar devices. At their latest estimate, we have a lifetime usage figure of 14 hours. In the same logic, TVs such as LCD and LED reach more than 25 thousand hours. The MicroLED has an even longer lifespan, due to its inorganic components.
However, its most relevant weakness is the so-called burn-in. This can happen if the TV screen is used for a long time in a static spot. With this, brands can appear on your screen, which harms the use for certain consumers, such as video games.
The only weak point of MicroLED 2q6w3g
You may be thinking: what would be the problem with a technology that can overcome the problems of OLED, which was until then the most advanced screen technology. Well, in fact, the technology itself does not have a clear defect. Its lifespan is the longest on the market, it has high lighting like QLED but reaches absolute black like OLED. Add to that that it is the smallest technology on the market, being optimized for use even in smartphones.
Well, the “Achilles heel” of the MicroLED is its market value. This is because the technology is still extremely expensive to produce. In addition, the fact that it has a much longer useful life, derived from its inorganic materials, only contributes to increasing its value for the final consumer.
In comparison, this leaves it a bit at a disadvantage with other technologies, which have a more market-matched price tag. However, it is worth ing that the equality between QLED and OLED begins to disappear with the increase in screen size. To the point that a 65′ model from Samsung (QLED) costs between 12 to 13 thousand reais while one of the same size from LG (OLED) is almost 16 thousand. In this logic, a similar MicroLED will be even more expensive, but we will only be sure on the second semester.
So which is the best? 5v462b
If you read our previous text you will that we said that some crucial differences between QLED and OLED make a very categorical separation of your audience. That's because while quality and technology innovation is in the hands of OLED, comfort for those who use screens for a long time is with QLED.
However, when we add MicroLED to the competition, things change a bit. Samsung went with the MicroLED with its new TV, The Wall, and it proved to be a genuinely new technology. It combines all the good points of the others: very high peak brightness, extremely high color reproduction, absolute blacks, wider viewing angles and no risk of image retention or screen burn.
However, this perfection comes with a very high cost of production that is even delaying the arrival of MicroLED to the final market. Thus, even if it is the technology of the future, it is still far from affordable for consumers. With that, QLED is still valid, even with OLED advantages in innovation. Now, if you don't have problems with spending much more for a more complete and lasting technology, maybe waiting for the end of the year for the possible launch of the first MicroLED is the option.
