Table of Contents 64q43
Over time, several scientific studies and even our logical or intuitive reasoning leads us to believe the obvious: smarter people are naturally more apt to become leaders, correct? 54zz
So like some people we found stupid or with intelligence inferior to ours, they can be leaders successful in the most diverse areas or even be ired by your subordinates? Check this article.
Stupid and successful. How can? 43255w
This is what a study of University of Lausanne, headquartered in Switzerland, tries to explain by analyzing about 400 leaders in 30 countries working in different fields and productive sectors.
While their intellectual capacities were measured by a traditional IQ test, the skills of lead were evaluated through interviews with eight co-workers who were able to make an average assessment of their performance as a leader, that is, their own subordinates.
It was there that the subtle relationship between a leader's intelligence and leadership levels was discovered when taking into the way he is perceived by his followers.
Ideal IQ for Leaders 683f5w
While leaders with IQ slightly below average were not well rated by their peers, who obtained QI over 120 was also perceived as ineffective. And here's the big surprise: the bigger the QI, the more likely these leaders are to be viewed negatively as well.
Factors such as gender or salary differences did not seem to contribute anything to change the perception of the interviewed subordinates.
Another surprising conclusion is that when the difference between the QI of the boss and that of his subordinates was higher than 18 points, they began to evaluate their leader even more negatively.
Going to the other extreme, leaders who have achieved QI of barely 82 were viewed as positively as those of IQ 118, even when they had a statistically lower performance.
To minimize the problem, the study recommended that the manager of a group with average intelligence, that is, with an IQ of around 100, should have an intelligence quotient of at most 118, to be considered part of the good group. successful.
Although this score is enough to classify this leader as 'highly intelligent', she is far from 'superior intelligence', whose score is between 130 and 145, and even further from the 'extremely talented' level, IQ above 145.
Part of this surprising result can be better understood by looking at the various capabilities that a good leader must bring together. Depending on the culture of the type of work performed or even the company, many of your roles depend more on technical skills, while others require soft skills..
As such, this phenomenon may have less to do with an ingrained prejudice against 'nerds' and more to do with our ability to understand them.
Understanding is the key 674k5h
Research suggests that the biggest problem for higher IQ leaders is facing the so-called 'understanding gap', which represents the gap between what they say and what their less intelligent subordinates struggle to understand.
And, according to the study's lead author, John Antonakis, the best way to avoid such a gap is simply to use one's intelligence to build creative metaphors that can persuade and inspire their employees.
“I think the only way for an intelligent person to signal their intelligence properly and still connect with people is to speak in a charismatic way,” explained Antonakis.
So the secret is simply having charisma? 6h3f42
While this is easier said than done, this solution can be a first step in the right direction towards building a better future with fewer misperceptions and thus putting the smartest and most qualified people into successful leadership positions.
Source: Interesting Engineering
Have you ever had a leader like that? Leave a comment.
